Closing Zami, after the final page, for the second time in my life finds me flooded with thoughts, wide and deep. Thoughts of race, gender, sexual orientation, and the craft of writing. Thoughts of my own lovers, my own survival, my own growth and change in the gap of the twenty years between readings.
My body recognized certain passages — Lorde’s first description of being with another woman — and how it felt to read that for the first time in the late ’80s/early ’90s, a time when I went from being the only gay woman I knew to being a lesbian in language, in community, in identity. A time when I was part of a sisterhood of other women — young, smart, confrontational feminists demanding that the world change — but always feeling on the fringe of the fringe myself, an outsider due to my own insecurities and identity issues.
I ached and angered at the racial discriminations Lorde describes, but always with a layer of guilt for my own whiteness. And then a confusion as to what it means to be a woman of color, a term introduced to me during my studies of feminism in the ’90s. During that first reading, I still considered myself to be Spanish and checked the box for “Hispanic” whenever prompted for race.
Reading Zami now brings up many of the same memories, although this time they are tempered by years and experience and perhaps a bit of softening (or becoming jaded, depending on how generous I feel with myself on any particular day and topic). I consider the craft more, which is to say I never considered it all the first reading. How does Lorde keep me so intently focused on reading when Dorothy Allison’s One or Two Things I Know for Sure did not? Is it content or craft or both? Is it a question of where I am at the moment of reading, much like Gabriel García Márquez’s 100 Years of Solitude (which I could not get into on the first three attempts and then one day found myself absorbed and unable to put it down)? How did that book go from being one I disliked to one of my top five favorites?
A friend suggested to me a few possible traits that, for her at any rate, make an autobiography interesting to read:
- a certain strength of the writer in overcoming adversity
- a connection to humanity
- the wisdom of perspective
When I consider those ideas, along with a couple of the assumptions I came into this semester with, such as autobiography as a way to…
- reflect/represent shared (and possibly under represented) realities
- honor one’s one voice
- create a new paradigm
- understand life better [perhaps the same as the 'wisdom of perspective']
… I begin to remember that autobiography at its most powerful is different from our culture’s obsession with reality television and tell-all ‘memoir.’
Lorde tells her story in a way that is so ‘under-written’ that it is compelling in its humanness, in its individuality amidst a context of culture and society, in its descriptions of anger and injustice without ever becoming an ‘angry’ book.
I’m reminded of something I once believed, something I wrote in my application essay for Goddard just last year:
I must tell my story, not because it is my story, but because the underlying truth of it is shared by others who have not yet voiced their own heartbreaks, abuses, struggles or moments of transcendence.
It isn’t my story, my voice, or my poem. Once I get out of the way, then what is created is a connection to another human being. Crafting those connections is where my interest and my responsibilities lie and what I strongly believe my job is in this lifetime. It is, in a sense, to follow William Stafford’s interpretation of Blake’s Golden Thread–the knowing that every thread, if followed, has a poem at its end. It is those threads that bind us in our humanity.
Zami is one of those threads.
Lorde, Audre.
Zami, a New Spelling of My Name. Crossing Press Feminist Series. Trumansburg, N.Y.: Crossing Press, 1982.
Zami is a self-declared “biomythography” of the early part of Audre Lorde’s life, from growing up in a West Indies family to carving out her Independence as a Black, gay woman during the WWII era of the 40s and the Red Scare/McCarthyism of the 50s. Zami tells an intensely personal story of Lorde’s life, and the women she loved, against the ever-present awareness of the political climate through which she had to navigate, even within her own relationships and friendships.
Zami both preserves a historical context for current and future generations to better understand issues of race, gender, and sexual identity in our culture as well as providing a literary autobiography of great craft. Lorde’s sense of poetry interweaves with her directness of storytelling, creating a balance of language and narrative.